Home » Foreign Policy, Human Rights, International Law, Supreme Court

DC Circuit upholds corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute

In a 3-1 decision, John Doe VIII v. Exxon Mobil, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that a corporation could be liable under the Alien Tort Statute.  The Blog of Legal Times reports:

In a major ruling with wide implications for corporations that operate overseas, a divided federal appeals court in Washington today said Exxon Mobil Corp. is not immune from liability for alleged brutal conduct that agents of the company allegedly orchestrated against a group of Indonesian villagers.

The plaintiffs, 15 Indonesian villagers, sued Exxon in two actions in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, claiming government security forces, working for Exxon, killed and tortured villagers in Aceh, Indonesia.

The villagers, represented by Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, alleged Exxon employed Indonesian military as private security to protect a natural gas facility. The plaintiffs’ lawyers argued Exxon had control over the soldiers.

“The law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents,” Judge Judith Rogers of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said in the opinion, joined by Judge David Tatel. “This is confirmed in international practice, both in treaties and in legal systems throughout the world.”

The majority judges—Judge Brett Kavanaugh voted in dissent—sent the case back to Washington federal district court for further proceedings. The initial suit has been pending for a decade.

Cohen Milstein’s Agnieszka Fryszman, who argued for the plaintiffs in the D.C. Circuit in January, praised the D.C. Circuit’s ruling, calling it a “big and significant win that makes our case much stronger than it was before the appeal.”

“The ability to hold companies accountable, and the threat of the statute being out there, is an important check on conduct,” Fryszman said. “There is nothing unfair about holding a company accountable on its own home.”

O’Melveny & Myers partner Sri Srinivasan, who argued for Exxon, referred comment to Exxon. An Exxon spokesman said the company is reviewing the decision.

“We have fought these baseless claims for many years. The plaintiffs’ claims are without merit,” the statement said. “While conducting its business in Indonesia, ExxonMobil has worked for generations to improve the quality of life in Aceh through employment of local workers, provision of health services and extensive community investment. The company strongly condemns human rights violations in any form.”

I am just beginning to analyze this decision, but it seems to be quite a significant decision– especially inasmuch as it seems to be variance with the Second Circuit’s decision last December in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum– which held that international law does not recognize corporate liability for torts in violation of the law of nations. More analysis to follow.

Share/Bookmark this!

Leave a reply

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally recognized avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Connect: LinkedIn profile Connect: Twitter profile
Connect: LinkedIn profile

Welcome! Who am I?

Anthony Clark Arend is Professor of Government and Foreign Service at Georgetown University and the Director of the Master of Science in Foreign Service in the Walsh School of Foreign Service.

Commentary and analysis at the intersection of international law and politics.