QUESTION: (In Spanish.)
INTERPRETER: The journalist was just asking how the U.S. intends to negotiate to get the United Kingdom to sit at the table and address the Malvinas issue. And he was then asking about this setting up of the fund. So, what’s the reserves of the country?
SECRETARY CLINTON: As to the first point, we want very much to encourage …
Latest Entries
Video and Text: Secretary Clinton on the Falkland/Malvinas dispute
March 2, 2010 # 10:31 pm # Armed Conflict, Foreign Policy, International Law # No CommentOpinio Juris’s Online Symposium on Glennon’s “The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression”
March 1, 2010 # 3:43 pm # Armed Conflict, Foreign Policy, International Law, International Organizations # No Comment
As indicated in a previous post, Opinio Juris is hosting the Yale Journal of International Law Online Symposium on Professor Michael Glennon’s article, “The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression.” Professor Glennon’s initial post has appeared today. The response of Larry Johnson, former UN Assistant-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs, can be found here. And, finally, my response can be found here.
Be sure …
Breaking News: Supreme Court sends Uighurs’ case back to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
March 1, 2010 # 10:42 am # Armed Conflict, Foreign Policy, Human Rights, International Law, Supreme Court # No CommentSCOTUSblog reports:
The Supreme Court on Monday ordered the D.C. Circuit Court to take a new look at the case testing federal judges’ powers to order Guantanamo Bay detainees released from custody — a case the Justices had granted and were to hear later this month. In a brief order, without noted dissent, the Court said the Circuit Court was to …
Opinio Juris to host Yale Journal of International Law Online Symposium on Glennon’s “The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression”
February 28, 2010 # 7:02 pm # Armed Conflict, Foreign Policy, Human Rights, International Law, International Organizations # No CommentJulian Ku over at Opinio Juris explains:
On Monday, Michael J. Glennon of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy will be leading a discussion around his timely Article The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression. In his Article, Glennon addresses the draft definition of the crime of aggression that was released in early 2009 and is set to be voted upon by …
Transcript of Oral Argument in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
February 27, 2010 # 7:15 pm # Armed Conflict, Foreign Policy, Human Rights, International Law, Supreme Court # No CommentA previous post noted that oral argument was to be held last Tuesday in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project. The transcript from the oral argument can be found here.
In case you missed it, the New York Times described the oral argument as follows:
The Supreme Court struggled Tuesday to balance the constitutional rights of humanitarian aid groups with the government’s efforts …
Does the Establishment Clause in the US Constitution limit foreign policy?
February 26, 2010 # 8:21 pm # Foreign Policy, Human Rights, Supreme Court # 2 CommentsOver at Georgetown/On Faith in the Washington Post, my colleague Michael Kessler is beginning a series of articles on that question. He explains:
Does the Establishment Clause prevent the President from using or aiding religion as part of foreign policy? Absolutely not, so long as it is not action upon U.S. citizens.
You may not like this result, and you may think …
The UN’s approval ratings– better than Congress
February 26, 2010 # 7:09 pm # Armed Conflict, Education, Foreign Policy, Human Rights, International Law, International Organizations # No CommentMy friend and colleague, Erik Voeten posts over at The Monkey Cage:
A new Gallup World Affairs Poll shows that thirty-one percent of Americans say the United Nations is doing a good job of solving the problems it has had to face. This is a slight improvement over last year’s numbers but still low. Over at Opinio Juris, there is a …
ORAL ARGUMENT TODAY: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
February 23, 2010 # 8:46 am # Armed Conflict, Foreign Policy, Human Rights, International Law, International Organizations, Supreme Court # No CommentAs SCOTUSblog reports, the oral argument is scheduled for
~10 a.m. -In Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (08-1498; 09-89), the Court will consider whether a federal statute prohibiting the knowing provision of “any service, training, [or] expert advice or assistance” to a designated foreign terrorist organization is unconstitutionally vague. Lyle Denniston’s discussion of the case is here.
My Georgetown University Law Center …
Subscribe RSS
Comment RSS


